Great Rivers Environmental Law Center

DRINKING WATER AWARENESS WEEK: LET’S NOT FORGET THE EXISTING CHALLENGES 

Great Rivers Environmental Law Center encourages more than just awareness during Drinking Water Awareness Week.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
May 10, 2024 

Contact: Natalie Johnson, Executive Director | njohnson@greatriverslaw.org | (314) 231-4181 x 1009

St. Louis, MO – Governor Parson’s designation of May 5 – 11 as Drinking Water Awareness Week in Missouri serves as a poignant reminder of the critical importance of water—a resource too often taken for granted.

While education campaigns during this week play a crucial role in raising awareness about water stewardship, it’s essential to acknowledge the existing challenges to water quality that persist in Missouri. 

Great Rivers Environmental Law Center (GRELC), a legal environmental nonprofit serving Missouri and Southern Illinois, has been dedicated to environmental and public health protection through legal resources for over two decades. More recently, the organization has experienced a significant uptick in calls for support from community members and organizations regarding local drinking water issues. 


“Many individuals in Missouri still lack trust in their tap water at home, work, and school. We know because we’ve received requests for support from these concerned citizens. It’s alarming that these issues are occurring right in our own backyard,”
– Natalie Johnson, Executive Director of GRELC. 


GRELC has been actively investigating drinking water concerns in both Portageville and, more recently, Salem, MO. Efforts have also been directed towards examining groundwater contamination in Washington, MO, connected to a superfund site. Additionally, GRELC has received mounting concerns about potential groundwater contamination in areas near the hundreds of confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs). 

One of GRELC’s most impactful endeavors culminated in the passage of the Get Lead Out of Drinking Water Act on July 1, 2022. This legislation established standards for lead concentrations in school drinking water, mandating that publicly funded schools conduct thorough inventory, sampling, remediation, and monitoring at all potable water outlets. Additionally, Missouri Legislation earmarked $27 million to assist schools in reducing lead concentrations, thereby ensuring safer environments for students. Schools face an August deadline to complete all testing and promptly make results, along with any remediation plans, available to the public.  

GRELC stands out as Missouri’s only nonprofit of its kind, often stepping in to offer legal support when all other avenues have failed. When addressing Missouri’s drinking water issues, they emphasize the necessity for action beyond mere awareness. 

While we applaud the recognition of Drinking Water Awareness Week, we must not lose sight of the work that remains. It is imperative that our communities continue to advocate for infrastructure upgrades, robust regulatory frameworks, and collaborative partnerships to ensure equitable access to clean water. In the meantime, we invite anyone in Missouri and Southern Illinois who is experiencing concerns about their drinking water to give us a call,” emphasized Johnson. 


Great Rivers Environmental Law Center is a non-profit 501(c)3 environmental law center providing free and low cost services to protect the environment and public health. We work to promote the public health by encouraging cleaner energy, improved environmental performance by businesses, and more efficient transportation and land use, thereby achieving cleaner air and water, and improving the quality of life in the region.

Great Rivers to host the Wild and Scenic Film Festival

Join us for an epic night of awe-inspiring films celebrating the beauty and wonder of our wild and scenic world!

The Wild & Scenic Film Festival shares an urgent call to action, encouraging all of us to learn more about what we can do to save our threatened planet. Showcasing films from directors across the country, the Festival inspires environmental activism and a love for nature through film.

Join Great Rivers Environmental Law Center as we premiere a selection of environmental short films designed to inspire and educate. The event is free and open to the public with tickets first available to existing donors.

Attendees will have the opportunity to meet representatives from Great Rivers to learn more about how we ensure compliance with the environmental laws that protect us.

———————————————————————————————————-
Early ticket reservations for this free event will be available through March 25th to new donors and to those who have already supported Great Rivers in 2024 and/or 2023. A promo code to unlock reservations will be emailed to new and existing donors.

We invite each donor to also reserve a ticket for a friend who is interested to learn more about our work!

———————————————————————————————————

We offer a special thank you to this event’s generous sponsor, Magnificent Missouri. Magnificent Missouri works to conserve and increase appreciation of the Katy Trail and the last 100 miles of the Missouri River Valley — as a premier regional asset — through education, events, and collaborative projects. You can learn more about their fantastic work to support conservation, economic development, and historic preservation efforts in communities along the Missouri River and Katy Trail at https://www.magnificentmissouri.org/.

———————————————————————————————————

Great Rivers Environmental Law Center is a nonprofit organization working to protect the environment and preserve the public health in Missouri and Southern Illinois. We provide our services at no or low cost to individuals and groups looking to protect clean air and water, care for our lands, advance renewable energy, and bring environmental justice to the people of our region. Through the generosity of our donors, we are lawyers for the environment – and lawyers for you. Learn more or make a gift at https://www.greatriverslaw.org.

Date and Time

Wednesday, April 10 · 6 – 8:30pm CDT

Location

Chase Park Plaza Cinemas
212 Kingshighway Boulevard
St. Louis, MO 63108

Tickets

Tickets are required for this event. Make your reservation at https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-wild-and-scenic-film-festival-tickets-817380506097?aff=ebdssbdestsearch.

Great Rivers Environmental Law Center Expands with Hire of Executive Director, Natalie Johnson 

Photo Credit: Tony V. Martin

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 
1/26/2024 
Contact:  Linden Mueller | linden@greatriverslaw.org | (314)231-4181x.5 

On January 22, 2024, Great Rivers Environmental Law Center welcomed Natalie Johnson as Executive Director. With more than 15 years of expertise in conservation, advocacy, and community outreach initiatives, Johnson joins the current team at the Law Center, which includes Bruce Morrison, who remains on staff as General Counsel.  

“Natalie brings abilities that will allow us to serve more communities throughout the region,” said Bruce Morrison, General Counsel. “I look forward to working with Natalie in the years to come.” 

After a decade dedicated to safeguarding the Indiana dunes and Lake Michigan in Northwest Indiana, Johnson has recently returned to the St. Louis area. Notably, she served as the Executive Director of the longstanding environmental advocacy nonprofit, Save the Dunes. During her tenure, her commitment to protecting people’s right to access the Lake Michigan shoreline earned her recognition as the Up & Coming Influential Woman of 2019 in Tourism by the Northwest Indiana Influential Women’s Association. In 2020, she was further acknowledged as one of Northwest Indiana’s 20 Under 40 for her exceptional leadership in the nonprofit sector. 

Throughout her professional journey, Johnson has consistently championed environmental causes and community empowerment. Her advocacy and outreach efforts have encompassed engaging with legislators both locally and in D.C., spearheading coalitions focused on enhancing water quality and access, delivering speeches at diverse events, conducting community workshops, and assisting organizations in enhancing their capacity and impact. In her most recent role, Johnson served as Advancement Associate for the Central Region at the Sierra Club, where she supported over 10 states in devising and executing advancement strategies. These strategies aimed to cultivate relationships, connect individuals with environmental initiatives, and contribute to building a more sustainable future for Sierra Club’s work. 

“I am honored to take on the role as Great Rivers Environmental Law Center’s Executive Director and to work with a team of skilled and dedicated individuals in safeguarding the people and natural environment of Missouri,” Johnson expressed. “Great Rivers is renowned for its legal achievements, dedication to environmental justice, and proactive approach to environmental issues. Being part of such an impactful organization is truly exhilarating.” 

Since 2002, the Law Center has served Missouri and Southern Illinois, providing free and low-cost legal services to individuals, organizations, and citizen groups who are working to protect the environment and public health. Building on previous experience, Johnson will oversee aspects of the Center’s operations including staff leadership, program direction, strategic planning, fundraising, fiscal management, marketing and community outreach. She joins the team at an exciting time of growth as the Law Center seeks to increase its presence across the region and take more precedent-setting cases to protect human and environmental health. The center will also increase its legal staff this year. 

“As Great Rivers Environmental Law Center embarks on its third decade of service to Missouri and Southern Illinois, the need for environmental protection has never been more pronounced,” shared Kathleen Henry, former Law Center President. “We enthusiastically welcome Natalie and are eager for her leadership as we work to enhance our efforts in preserving our irreplaceable natural resources and safeguarding the health of our communities.” 


Great Rivers Environmental Law Center is a non-profit 501(c)3 environmental law center providing free and low-cost services to protect the environment and public health. Great Rivers works to promote the public health by encouraging cleaner energy, improved environmental performance by businesses, and more efficient transportation and land use, thereby achieving cleaner air and water, and improving the quality of life in the region. Learn more at www.greatriverslaw.org. 

[VICTORY ALERT!] Meatpacker withdraws request to dump wastewater into Pomme de Terre River

BY: ALLISON KITE | The Missouri Independent | January 9, 2024 
Photo via US Army Corps of Engineers

A southwest Missouri meatpacker has withdrawn its request to discharge treated wastewater into an impaired river after state regulators announced their intent to deny the company a permit. 

Missouri Prime Beef Packers, which processes 3,500 cattle per week near Pleasant Hope, sought permission from the state last year to use a proprietary microbe technology to treat wastewater from its operations and discharge it into the Pomme de Terre River.

It had previously applied the wastewater to surrounding land as fertilizer. 

But the company informed the Missouri Department of Natural Resources last week that it was withdrawing its application for a permit to discharge water from its operations into the Pomme de Terre River. Representatives for the company did not immediately return a request for comment. 

The Pomme de Terre River winds through the Ozark region of southwest Missouri and provides clear, spring-fed water for canoeing, swimming and fishing. But it’s impaired by E. coli contamination, landing it on a federal list of impaired waterways.

In 2019, the river was found to have an average of more than 200 E. coli colonies per 100 milliliters of water, well above the limit of 126. E. coli data from 2020 are incomplete because of the COVID-19 pandemic’s effect on sample collection, and newer data are not yet available.

Pomme de Terre Lake, which is fed by the river, is also considered impaired because of high levels of chlorophyll-a, indicating the water is receiving too much phosphorus and nitrogen, which can lead to harmful algae blooms that reduce oxygen in the water and kill fish. Some blooms can lead to toxins and bacteria that can make people sick. 

Runoff from farms is a major source of nitrogen and phosphorus, which are found in animal waste. Untreated, the water from the meatpacking facility’s processing could also contain those chemicals. 

Because of the river’s existing struggle with contamination, environmental advocates feared allowing Missouri Prime Beef Packers to release wastewater into the river would make things worse. While the company would treat the water before releasing it, critics raised concerns about the effectiveness of the company’s microbe technology, called iLeaf. 

The Missouri Department of Natural Resources had previously reviewed the Missouri Prime Beef Packers’ request and determined it wouldn’t harm the river. But after hearing concerns from members of the public, the agency announced a draft denial, saying the company didn’t meet all of the regulatory requirements to use an innovative technology

John Hoke, director of the agency’s water protection programs, said at the time that the department hadn’t seen the technology used at the scale the meatpacking facility proposed to use it.

Heather Peters, the Missouri Department of Natural Resources’ water pollution control branch chief, said in an emailed statement that until the meatpacking facility has a permit for land application it either has to store its wastewater, haul it to a treatment facility or take it out of state.


Read Great Rivers’ Comments on behalf of the Missouri Coalition for the Environment and the Sierra Club Missouri Chapter here:

Comments on Missouri Prime Beef Packers – Water Quality and Antidegradation
Review – Permit No. MO-0113204


Great Rivers Environmental Law Center is a non-profit 501(c)3 environmental law center providing free and low cost services to protect the environment and public health. We work to promote the public health by encouraging cleaner energy, improved environmental performance by businesses, and more efficient transportation and land use, thereby achieving cleaner air and water, and improving the quality of life in the region. Learn more at www.greatriverslaw.org.

Hold Onto Your Hogs!

VICTORY ALERT: Great Rivers successfully squashes subpoena on behalf of longtime safe-agriculture activist.  

You know you’re doing something right when your kids gift you a megaphone for Mother’s Day. Karen Hudson, mother, educational activist, and recipient of said megaphone, had been standing up to factory farms for over twenty-five years. As Karen shares in a 2011 TED Talk, driven by a passion for safe agriculture cultivated while living on a 5th-generation family farm in central Illinois, in 1996, she founded Families Against Rural Messes (FARM) after an industrial dairy facility threatened the health of her town.  

Across the country, concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs), like the dairy facility that threatened Karen’s town, have become notorious for their alleged pollution of air, water and land. According to the Natural Resource Defense Council, animal waste from CAFOs can “run off into surface waters, seep into groundwater, and produce noxious gases” that can “impact an entire community’s quality of life and mental health.” Furthermore, according to NRDC’s report on Harmful Algae Blooms, “CAFO waste that leaks, seeps and runs off into waterways is a major contributor to nutrient pollution, which feeds harmful algae blooms.” The Center for Disease Control reports that “repeated exposure to CAFO emissions can increase the likelihood of respiratory diseases.”  

Seeing these issues first-hand in her own town and hearing about CAFOs in nearby communities, Karen co-founded the Illinois Coalition for Clean Air and Water (ICCAW) to advocate for sound policies and practices that protect the environment, human health, and rural quality of life from the impacts of large-scale, industrialized livestock production facilities in Illinois. 

Though now in retirement, Karen recently came head-to-head again with factory farms recently when she was subpoenaed by an industrial livestock facility.  

In June of 2022, Karen, along with ICAAW and related organization Socially Responsible Agriculture Project (SRAP), were subpoenaed for privileged information by County Line Swine, an industrial swine farm and the defendant in a suit filed against the swine farm by neighbors of the facility.  

In the 2022 suit, Crystal and Randall Clair, organic farmers whose land neighbors the operation, and Shawn Peters, who lives across from the facility, allege that County Line Swine “intentionally and/or negligently [failed] to follow appropriate operating procedures,” for the facility, subjecting them to “frequent additional odor, particulate matter, discharges of hog manure and urine, other emissions, flies, insects and/or other pests.” The complaint claims that this caused “headaches, difficulty breathing, burning of the throat, and watery eyes,” and that “the nuisances and problems…[were] the direct result of Defendants’ intentional misconduct and/or negligent and improper operation, management, and maintenance of the CAFO, including the mishandling of waste produced by hogs and the disposal of carcasses of dead hogs.

Karen Hudson holding a sign from her original Families Against Rural Messes (FARM) campaign. (Source: nrdc.org)

The Plaintiffs’ suit further sues President and Secretary of County Line Swine Ragan Peter specifically for “intentional infliction of emotional distress.” The Clairs’ complaint alleges that Peter “attempted intimidation to silence any opposition…[Peter] accosted Crystal Clair at home, threatening, ‘If you continue to give me any trouble, your life and your livelihood will never be the same, because I’m going to bring the biggest and baddest pigs I can find.’” 

The Clairs were not the only citizens to note the impact of the facility. After receiving more than 45 complaints from properties surrounding the County Line Swine facility, the Illinois EPA inspected the facility. During the July 2020 inspection, according to the suit later filed by the Illinois Attorney General, against County Line Swine, Illinois EPA observed “livestock waste odor in air flow from the ventilation fans of the swine,” “mortality compost odor along the south side of the compost shed,” and “livestock odor along Illinois Route 61 at distances of approximately 1.0 and 1.2 miles from the facility.” Illinois EPA subsequently issued a violation notice to County Line Swine but continued to receive citizen complaints about the facility.  

According to the Clairs’ complaint, “unlike traditional pork farmers, County Line Swine is part of a system where a few large multinational corporations, known as ‘integrators,’ own the animals that are raised inside specific industrial CAFO sites.” (Image source: Canva.) 

As a result, in February of 2022, the Illinois Attorney General filed suit against County Line Swine in Adams County Circuit Court for “causing or allowing the emission of strong, persistent and offensive livestock odors from the Facility so as to injure human health and interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring properties” in violation of Illinois law. In that case, the Illinois Attorney General seeks orders from the court to require that County Line Swine “[undertakes] necessary corrective action that will result in a final and permanent abatement of violations” and pays civil penalties for all violations to the State. 

In the suit filed by the Clairs, County Line Swine served Karen Hudson, ICCAW and SRAP with subpoenas seeking communications between the third-parties and the Clairs and their attorneys. County Line Swine further sought a bevy of sensitive, confidential organizational documents from the two third-party organizations. These subpoenas were sent to Karen and the organizations despite the fact that County Line Swine did not first seek the same information and documents from the parties to the two cases.   

Great Rivers Environmental Law Center stepped up to defend Karen and ICCAW against the subpoenas. Great Rivers attorney Sarah Rubenstein, along with environmental attorney Albert Ettinger, representing SRAP, filed a motion to quash the subpoenas.  

The Motion to Quash asserted that the subpoenas were a “clear overreach beyond discovery of the subject matter” of the Clair case. Furthermore, the Motion asserts that the subpoenas were “unduly burdensome” to a third party, especially as “the Crystal Clair complaint does not mention SRAP, ICCAW, or Hudson, or has anything to do with SRAP, ICCAW, or Hudson.” The Motion points out that Karen, ICAAW and SRAP’s implication in the case was unnecessary, begging the question of why County Line Swine would subpoena them.  

Among the organizations subpoenaed was the Socially Responsible Agriculture Project, or SRAP. (Source: SRAP.) 

The swine facility may have solicited an undue number of documents in the hopes of finding something in the ocean of information to support their defense. However, such “fishing expeditions” are not legal. As the Motion to Quash points out, third- party subpoena rights do not permit “compelling records for a general inspection, for fishing purposes, or with the view of finding evidence to be used in other suits of prosecutions,” as “a party may not dredge an ocean of electronically stored information and records in an effort to capture a few elusive, perhaps non-existent, fish.” (Quoting Tucker v Am. Intl’l Group, Inc., 281 F.R.D. 85, 95 (D. Conn. 2012)) 

The Motion to Quash further asserted that the information requested in the subpoenas was irrelevant. “The Defendant’s Subpoenas explicitly request communications that have nothing to do with even the County Line Swine operation or even with operations in Illinois.” As the Motion contended, “defendants want to use the Subpoenas as an opportunity to access SRAP, ICCAW, and Karen Hudson’s files well beyond the scope of the underlying litigation.”  

In response to the strong evidence provided, Karen, ICCAW and SRAP’s Motion to Quash was granted. In doing so, the Court found that the requests contained in the subpoenas were “overbroad in that they seek an extremely expansive amount of information from non-parties.” Ten paragraphs of requests were found to be “not relevant to the issues, claims and defenses asserted.”

The court noted that “before anyone, party or non-party, can be forced to submit to a deposition, the evidence that is sought must be relevant.”  

Great Rivers is equipped to stand up to subpoenas on behalf of environmental individuals and organizations. With your support, we can continue defending those who defend our people and planet.  

(Header image via Canva.)


Eva Kappas is a student at Brown University studying International and Public Affairs and Hispanic Studies. A native St. Louisan, Eva is invested in protecting the people and places she calls home. She is excited by the potential to transform our electrical grid with renewable energy. In her free time, she can be found running in Forest Park, writing short stories, and practicing Spanish with her friends and family.

You’re putting THAT on your house?

Homeowners’ associations impede Missouri clean energy with policies that put aesthetics before sustainability.

In the 2022 legislative session the Missouri General Assembly passed legislation that helps solar energy generation. The new law should deter homeowners’ associations from prohibiting or limiting rooftop solar panels. Like all legal requirements, though, the new solar law is not self-executing. Some homeowners’ associations will comply. Others will not.

Over the past several months homeowners within a subdivision in Platte County, Missouri have reached out to us over the actions of their HOA. Our clients allege that the HOA was not complying with the newly enacted law. It had established a policy that roof-mounted solar panels could be installed only at the rear of a home, that only more expensive solar shingles (not solar panels) could be used, and that homeowners first had to obtain the consent of their neighbors to install solar. In April we sued the HOA on behalf of homeowners that wanted to install solar panels. These homeowners want to place solar collection systems on the roofs of their homes to reduce their reliance on fossil fuels, to save money, and to help offset the impacts of climate change. We are at a critical point where aesthetics should take a back seat to clean energy generation.

We need your support to continue protecting homeowners’ rights to reduce their fossil fuel use. Solar panels are a necessity, not a fashion statement! This is one front of many in the battle for clean energy. With your support, we will ensure homeowners have the choice to install rooftop solar panels and provide clean energy for their families. 

VICTORY ALERT! Progress at the PSC

Your household shouldn’t be penalized for energy conservation. We engaged the Missouri Public Service Commission to require Ameren to step up and keep costs down. 

The tide is turning for renewable energy in Missouri. At the end of 2021, coal provided 74% of Missouri’s electricity net generation, the second- highest share of any state, behind only West Virginia. But in 2022, Missouri’s electricity net generation from coal declined to an all-time low of 66%, moving the state to have only the fourth-highest share of coal generation. And renewable energy provided 12% of the state’s total electricity net generation in 2022, exceeding 10% for the second year in a row. So much of our climate and energy work is to move Missouri away from coal-fired electricity generation. 

This Spring, we were before the Missouri Public Service Commission (PSC) on several matters, pressing Missouri’s investor-owned utilities for change. Bruce and Ethan represented Metropolitan Congregations United, Missouri NAACP, and Sierra Club in an Ameren Missouri rate case (PSC File No. ER-2022-0337). We advocated for the Commission to require Ameren to identify capital costs that would be avoided if its Labadie or Sioux units were to retire before the end of this decade. Customers should be protected from an over-commitment of capital spending if Ameren’s current projected end-of-life dates prove wrong, as they have already at Ameren’s Rush Island facility. The Commission ruled in our favor, requiring that Ameren study potentially avoidable costs at Labadie and Sioux.  

In a separate issue in the same case, we advocated that the Commission not increase the monthly customer charge for any residential customers. At the hearing, we asserted that Ameren Missouri should not be allowed to raise its residential flat rate for electric service, as such a rate hike would disincentivize energy conservation for consumers. Higher customer charges reduce a household’s ability to lower their total bill through energy efficiency and conservation, effectively penalizing low energy users. As such, the rate hike would also put a disproportionate burden on low-income customers.  The PSC ruled in favor of our clients, marking a stride towards prioritizing environmental justice.  

We rely on your support to keep standing to Ameren and protecting customers across the state. We’re advocating for a clean-energy future that leaves no one behind. 


Eva Kappas is a student at Brown University studying International and Public Affairs and Hispanic Studies. A native St. Louisan, Eva is invested in protecting the people and places she calls home. She is excited by the potential to transform our electrical grid with renewable energy. In her free time, she can be found running in Forest Park, writing short stories, and practicing Spanish with her friends and family.


Great Rivers Environmental Law Center is a non-profit 501(c)3 environmental law center providing free and low cost services to protect the environment and public health. They work to promote the public health by encouraging cleaner energy, improved environmental performance by businesses, and more efficient transportation and land use, thereby achieving cleaner air and water, and improving the quality of life in the region. Learn more at www.greatriverslaw.org.

Just Keep Swimming?

An authorization of wastewater discharge would threaten a recreational river. 

Taking a dip in the cool turquoise riverways of Missouri is a summer tradition cherished by state residents. Just as clean water is a right, so is safe recreation and the enjoyment of the natural beauty of our state. And when our waterways are threatened by pollution, not only is the river ecosystem compromised, but human health is at risk.  

Recently, Missouri Prime Beef Packers, a cattle production and beef processing facility located in Pleasant Hope, proposed to discharge 350,000 gallons per day of their waste directly into the Pomme de Terre River. The Missouri Department of Natural Resources issued a Water Quality and Antidegradation Review to assess the plan and determine the effluent limits for discharge. However, the proposed effluent limits are concerning, considering the facility’s history of compliance violations and proposed use of experimental waste treatment technology. In addition, authorizing additional pollution into the river may violate the law. 

Great Rivers attorney Ethan Thompson, on behalf of Missouri Coalition for the Environment and the Sierra Club Missouri Chapter, submitted comments on the Review to DNR. 

As the comments stress, “Prime Beef Packers has a troubling record of water permit violations that brings into question the Facility’s ability to abide by effluent limits.” In the last 10 years, the facility has received nine letters of warning and 14 notices of violation. Four of these notices of violation and one letter have been issued since June of 2021. The facility has also consistently failed to submit timely Discharge Monitoring Reports as recently as the first quarter of 2023. As the comments assert, the consistency of these violations “demonstrates that the Company has and will continue to flagrantly violate the law as long as there are no significant consequences.” A company that consistently fails to abide by the law should not be granted new opportunities to pollute the environment.

The facility proposes using unidentified microorganisms to treat wastewater. (Image source: Canva.) 

In addition, how the effluent limits are determined is unclear, as the dataset(s) and methods used in the Review were not provided in the Review posted for public comment. As the comments stress, “it is therefore difficult for the public to assess the protective ability of the proposed effluent limits,” especially as “the Review does not spell out monitoring requirements and does not include any reporting requirements.” Pomme de Terre was recently proposed for listing by the Department as impaired for E coli, making it critical that further discharge is not approved without informed data review. 

Equally concerning is the Company’s proposed use of an experimental technology called iLeaf to treat its waste. The technology proposes using unnamed microorganisms to treat wastewater in holding lagoons, however, scant information on iLeaf is uncovered both in the Review and through Internet searches. The one mention of iLeaf being used at an unnamed facility in Arkansas provides no insight into its effectiveness nor gives its length of time in use. With the proprietary nature of the technology obscuring much information on the nature of the microorganisms used in the iLeaf process, “Commentators are concerned that the presence of these microorganisms in the discharge could have negative effects on wildlife” as well as on the river’s recreational use. Even if the mysterious microorganisms are not harmful, it is unclear whether iLeaf will be able to adequately treat identified contaminants, as “iLeaf’s ability to treat several contaminants of concern [is] unquantified in the Review.”   

In the event of an iLeaf failure, chlorine would be used to treat contaminants. However, chlorine itself damages the river, and the Review admits that “there is no practicable way to monitor for Total Residual Chlorine at a level that meets the calculated effluent limits.”  

The Company’s historical and current noncompliance with monitoring and reporting, combined with their use of experimental technology, is a recipe for pollution. The potential pollution would have very real consequences for citizens who use the Pomme de Terre for recreational activities. According to the Center for Disease Control, exposure to E coli can cause severe stomach cramps, fever, vomiting, and bloody diarrhea. As the Commentators assert, “Facilities with this type of disregard for the law are not the type of facilities where the Department should be permitting additional discharges and allowing the use of untested technology to meet effluent standards,” especially when health is at stake. 

The Pomme de Terre is currently used for recreational purposes by the public, with an important fish habitat downstream. (Image source: Canva.)

Perhaps most thought-provoking is the Commenters’ questioning of the very basis of authorizing such a discharge. The Department has a “responsibility to protect water quality from degradation under the Missouri Clean Water Law,” yet alternatives to authorizing the discharge are not adequately evaluated in the Review. One such alternative would be acquiring additional land for land application. Moreover, “it is unclear from the Review why the Company cannot simply reduce operational capacity in order to comply with current permit obligations.”  

Great Rivers, MCE and the Sierra Club Missouri Chapter have requested a public hearing to resolve the issues raised in the comments and local concerns about the safety of recreational use of the Pomme de Terre. “If it is truly impracticable for the Facility to find an alternative to discharge, then the Department should explain this to the public at a public hearing.” Summer swimmers should worry about sunburns, not E coli


Eva Kappas is a student at Brown University studying International and Public Affairs and Hispanic Studies. A native St. Louisan, Eva is invested in protecting the people and places she calls home. She is excited by the potential to transform our electrical grid with renewable energy. In her free time, she can be found running in Forest Park, writing short stories, and practicing Spanish with her friends and family.

Meet Great Rivers’ 2023 Interns


Andrew Holder – Legal Intern, Summer 2023

Andrew is a rising 2L at Saint Louis University Law School. Originally from St. Louis, he graduated from Truman State University with a B.A. in Political Science and Business Administration. Andrew hopes to use his law degree to help promote public health and protect underprivileged communities. In his free time he enjoys going to concerts, listening to NPR and exploring the St. Louis region.


Eva Kappas – Outreach and Development Intern, Summer 2023

Eva is a sophomore at Brown University studying International and Public Affairs, English and Hispanic Studies. A native St. Louisan, Eva is excited by Great Rivers’ work to protect the people and places she calls home. As a volunteer with the Sunrise Movement, she has worked on climate advocacy projects in Missouri and Rhode Island, and is especially interested in transforming the electrical grid with renewable energy. In her free time, she can be found running in Forest Park, writing short stories, and practicing Spanish.


Anna Watson – Legal Intern, Summer 2023

Anna Watson is a rising 2L at Washington University in St. Louis School of Law. Prior to law school, she attended Butler University where she earned her B.A. in Environmental Studies. Issues of environmental justice and their intersections with the law motivated her to pursue her J.D., and she hopes to continue working in environmental law upon graduation. Beyond work, Anna enjoys exploring outdoor spaces, photography, and learning more about art and design. 


Kate Somerville – Legal Intern, Summer 2023

Kate is a senior at University of Michigan Ann Arbor majoring in Political Science, with minors in Environmental Science and Law, Justice, and Social Change. She is from Chicago, Illinois, where her family’s beekeeping endeavors have fostered a love for nature and the environment. These interests, in combination with her previous work experience in the legal world, have set her sights on a career in environmental law and policy. In her free time, Kate loves to spend time outdoors, travel, play volleyball, and listen to music (especially live music). She is thrilled to contribute to Great Rivers’ work and continue learning about environmental law.


Jade Zhang – Gephardt Fellow, Summer 2023

Jade is a junior studying political science and environmental studies at Washington University. She is a Civic Scholar and St. Louis Fellow through WashU’s Gephardt Institute and is interested in researching equitable, community-centered urban planning strategies that can alleviate the disparities in St. Louis housing.  In her free time, she enjoys reading fiction, walking outside (jogging if she’s feeling ambitious), and searching for the best pizza slice in St. Louis.


The Show Me Solar State 

Ameren’s proposed solar facility would transform the energy landscape of the region. 

The longer we wait to diversify our energy sources, the more costly the transition will be for companies, consumers and our environment. As such, we just finished up representing Sierra Club on Ameren’s proposal to construct a new solar energy generation facility (PSC file No. EA-2022-0245). At the evidentiary hearing we showed that Ameren will have no choice but to replace its coal generation in the coming years as those units approach the end of their useful lives. While the precise timing of those replacements is uncertain, we showed that Ameren’s customers and the environment will benefit if Ameren diversifies its energy generation sources today. Missouri Public Service Commission staff took an opposing view, asserting to the Commissioners that the solar facility is not needed. In April, the Commissioners granted a certificate of convenience and necessity authorizing construction of the 150 MW solar energy facility.

As the largest energy producer in Missouri, Ameren heavily influences our impact on the environment and sets the standard for energy generation. The new solar project is expected to produce enough renewable energy to meet the annual needs of nearly 27,500 homes and would allow 10 partnering organizations to source their energy entirely from renewables through Ameren’s Renewable Solutions program. This facility represents a critical step towards realizing Ameren’s plan for net-zero carbon emissions by 2045, a goal that still falls short of the national target of a carbon-pollution free power sector by 2035. 

As of 2022, the Mongomery Community Solar Center was the largest Ameren Missouri solar energy center at a capacity of 5.7 MW. The new facility will have a 150 MW capacity. (Photo via Ameren Missouri.) 

The utility still has a long way to go. In 2022, renewable energy accounted for only 3.6 million MWh of Ameren’s generated electricity, compared to the 25 million MWh generated from coal plants. (Source: 2023 Ameren Sustainability Report.) That is 7 times more coal energy than renewables. Great Rivers is pushing for the continued development of renewable resources to supply electricity for our state.  

We are representing several parties in Ameren Missouri’s stakeholder process regarding its upcoming 20-year Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). We will continue to advocate for earlier retirement of the company’s coal-fired power plants and increased reliance on solar and wind sources for energy generation. Your support makes this work happen.  

(Header image via Canva.)


Eva Kappas is a student at Brown University studying International and Public Affairs and Hispanic Studies. A native St. Louisan, Eva is invested in protecting the people and places she calls home. She is excited by the potential to transform our electrical grid with renewable energy. In her free time, she can be found running in Forest Park, writing short stories, and practicing Spanish with her friends and family.

Great Rivers Environmental Law Center is a non-profit 501(c)3 environmental law center providing free and low cost services to protect the environment and public health. They work to promote the public health by encouraging cleaner energy, improved environmental performance by businesses, and more efficient transportation and land use, thereby achieving cleaner air and water, and improving the quality of life in the region. Learn more at www.greatriverslaw.org.

A Permit Written in Sand

A potentially unlawful permit was terminated after the Ste. Genevieve community raised concerns. But mining giant NexGen Silica isn’t backing down.

This past year, despite widespread opposition from the community, the mining company NexGen Silica had been seeking authorization from the Missouri Department of Natural Resources to construct and operate a silica mine in Saint Genevieve County. 

With community organizations Operation Sand and Friends of Hawn, we represented Sierra Club in opposing NexGen’s application for a general operating permit to discharge its stormwater and process wastewater to the waters of the state. The Department had issued the permit authorizing the discharges in December 2022. With our colleagues, we appealed. 

The Administrative Hearing Commission conducted an evidentiary hearing on the permit in April 2023. Together with our colleagues we presented evidence showing that the Department had arbitrarily deprived concerned citizens of their right to a public hearing, that NexGen had failed to include with its permit application information to apprise the Department of the potential harm to the State’s waters, and that the Department unlawfully had failed to evaluate whether particular pollutants had the potential to cause harm and degrade the waters that would receive the discharges from the mine. 

The proposed mine site is located just two miles from Hawn State Park, Hickory Canyons and Pickle Springs’ Watershed. (Image credit: Operation Sand.)

After the hearing, while we were briefing the issues for the hearing commissioner, NexGen wrote to the Department and asked that its permit be terminated “in light of procedural concerns raised at the AHC hearing.” The Department has terminated the permit.

However, the fight isn’t over. Clark Bollinger, NexGen Silica’s general manager, promised the Ste. Genevieve Herald that “the development of our overall plan is a long process, and we are confident that we will acquire our required permits to move forward with our original plan.” Continued engagement from Friends of Hawn, Operation Sand, Sierra Club and Great Rivers will be critical to ensure the health of Ste. Genevieve residents and the surrounding environment is not compromised in NexGen Silica’s quest to spin sand into gold.   

(Header image via Operation Sand.)


Eva Kappas is a student at Brown University studying International and Public Affairs and Hispanic Studies. A native St. Louisan, Eva is invested in protecting the people and places she calls home. She is excited by the potential to transform our electrical grid with renewable energy. In her free time, she can be found running in Forest Park, writing short stories, and practicing Spanish with her friends and family.

Great Rivers Environmental Law Center is a non-profit 501(c)3 environmental law center providing free and low cost services to protect the environment and public health. They work to promote the public health by encouraging cleaner energy, improved environmental performance by businesses, and more efficient transportation and land use, thereby achieving cleaner air and water, and improving the quality of life in the region. Learn more at www.greatriverslaw.org.

To Breathe or Not to Breathe?

Free factory pollution image

The last thing polluted communities need is more pollution, yet unfortunately it’s what they often get. 

We work hard to protect the air we breathe. The cumulative effects from multiple sources of air pollution, especially in the young and the elderly, increase the risk of developing asthma and other respiratory illnesses, as well as cancer and heart disease. Year after year we engage the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) on the air pollution permits it issues across the State, advocating for better controls, adequate monitoring, and community engagement.

Last year, to help us better engage with communities affected by unhealthy air quality, the Missouri Foundation for Health gave us a grant enabling us to place air monitors in some of our most affected communities. This air monitoring project was borne out of partner concerns about the high incidence of asthma in their Communities.

In collaboration with community partners Dutchtown South Community Corporation, A Red Circle and the Old North St. Louis Restoration Group, we designed a monitoring network under the guidance of WashU engineering professor Jay Turner. The City of St. Louis gave Great Rivers permission to place our air monitors on its street light poles, and Dr. Turner’s graduate students installed the air monitors. Today, the monitors are in place and collecting data. (You can track the results and learn more about the project here.)

 

Air monitors installed in the Dutchtown, Old North, Pine Lawn neighborhoods of St. Louis. A total of 20 new air sampling sites were introduced, a major increase from the 8 active monitoring sites that previously existed in the whole St. Louis metropolitan area. (Picture credit: Yan He, Washington University in St. Louis.)

The project is timely, as the St. Louis metro area was recently “bumped up” by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to moderate nonattainment because of continued ozone pollution in the region.

The placement of the monitors and the data collected is enabling our community partners and their members to see first-hand how close they live, work, and play to unhealthy levels of air pollution. Armed with the data from the monitors, we advocate for more air monitoring in overburdened communities; for regulators to better account for the cumulative impacts of polluting sources; and for regulators to proactively engage with overburdened communities early in the permitting process.

(Header image via Openverse.)


Great Rivers Environmental Law Center is a non-profit 501(c)3 environmental law center providing free and low cost services to protect the environment and public health. We work to promote the public health by encouraging cleaner energy, improved environmental performance by businesses, and more efficient transportation and land use, thereby achieving cleaner air and water, and improving the quality of life in the region. Learn more at www.greatriverslaw.org.

[UPDATED: VICTORY ALERT!] All Aboard the Grain Belt Express!


October 12, 2023:

CASE UPDATE: A LONG-AWAITED VICTORY FOR THE CLIMATE AND OUR REGION! 

On October 12, 2023, the Missouri Public Service Commission voted to approve the Grain Belt Express, delivering a huge victory to clean energy advocates, Missouri residents, and the climate. The transmission line will bolster clean energy generation and decarbonization efforts, all while making tangible changes to the Missouri energy landscape by supplying electricity to those in need. The project will deliver enough clean, renewable energy to power 1.6 million homes by transporting electricity generated by wind and solar power in Kansas to Missouri residents. Additionally, the express line will allow utilities to be more affordable for many Missouri residents, with experts estimating it will save consumers just over 6% per year and 17.6 billion total in the coming decades (1). The announcement comes after years of advocacy by Great Rivers on behalf of Sierra Club and the efforts of many other organizations. Thank you to all who participated in bringing this long-awaited victory to our region!
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
June 23, 2023.

Last week, Great Rivers attorney Sarah Rubenstein appeared before the Missouri Public Service Commission on behalf of Sierra Club on the matter of the Grain Belt Express Line, a proposed electrical transmission line that would carry electricity from wind farms in southwestern Kansas to Missouri and beyond. As one of the first major interstate transmission lines through Missouri, the project is critical to the deployment of low-cost renewable energy across the Midwest. To reach 100% clean energy generation by 2035, transmission capacity will need to more than double. As a recent article by the New York Times highlighted, proposed high-voltage transmission lines like the Grain Belt Express are the keystone of any decarbonization plan. 

Sarah, on behalf of Sierra Club, urged the Public Service Commission to approve the Grain Belt project. Supported by the testimony of leading electric transmission planning expert Michael Milligan, Sierra Club put forth three main arguments in favor of the Grain Belt project. (You can watch Sarah’s opening statement of about 4 minutes and Michael’s longer testimony here.)   

First, Sierra Club asserted that the Grain Belt Express Line will provide significant economic benefits to Missouri. Aside from the immediate economic benefits of building transmission, reducing transmission constraints will provide long-term economic benefits by allowing electricity to be more easily transported from its generation site to where demand is high. Recent studies have found that transmission system congestion costs regional electric ratepayers billions of dollars per year. In 2021, total congestion costs in MISO and SPP, two transmission operating regions of the electrical grid, reached 2.8 billion dollars and 1.2 billion dollars for consumers, respectively. By removing congestion and improving access to low-cost generation, the Grain Belt Express will lower costs for Missouri electric ratepayers throughout the state. 

With the Grain Belt Line, during storms, the available electrical grid may cover a larger area than the storm, enabling larger remote resources not affected by the storm to deliver to homes that otherwise might be without power. (Source: Grain Belt Express) 

 

Second, Sierra Club testified that the Grain Belt Express will improve grid reliability and resource adequacy in Missouri. Operational reliability will be enhanced by the stronger links between regions that will help the grid respond to disturbances, such as the loss of a large coal plant. Stronger connections with neighboring regions will also allow for greater contingency reserve sharing between regions, and for a better, more coordinated economic dispatch response as part of recovery from disturbance. In addition, bolstered transmission connections would allow for more coordinated resource planning across regions. Resource adequacy will be enhanced because utilities in Missouri will have broader access to projects when they plan to meet their reserve margin requirements. Both Evergy and Ameren have stated recent plans to build significant wind and solar plants in coming years, and the Grain Belt Line will provide a pathway to transport this generation. 

Finally, Sierra Club explained how the proposed project will improve grid resilience in Missouri. By linking together large geographic areas, the Grain Belt Express will help create a larger geographic electrical area, effectively making the grid larger than an extreme weather event that could threaten it, such as a storm. Doing so will enable remote resources not affected by a storm event to deliver energy to areas within a storm otherwise without power. This resilience becomes increasingly necessary as extreme weather events become more frequent occurrences.  

As Sarah’s opening statement on behalf of Sierra Club illustrates, the Grain Belt Express Line is critical for both the safety and economic well-being of Missouri and Midwest residents.  

Missouri’s electricity is among the most coal-intensive in the country. But renewable resources are available right next door. New wind farms in Kansas have the potential to provide a bounty of clean energy to consumers beyond the state. In order to access this renewable energy and transition away from coal, we must first be able to connect to it. The Grain Belt Express Line promises to bring the future of renewables to Missouri and the region.  

Your support makes this critical work happen. We’re riding the Grain Belt Express into the renewable-energy future. It’s time for the Missouri Public Service Commission to get on board! 

(Header image via Canva.)


Eva Kappas is a student at Brown University studying International and Public Affairs and Hispanic Studies. A native St. Louisan, Eva is invested in protecting the people and places she calls home. She is excited by the potential to transform our electrical grid with renewable energy. In her free time, she can be found running in Forest Park, writing short stories, and practicing Spanish with her friends and family.

Great Rivers Environmental Law Center is a non-profit 501(c)3 environmental law center providing free and low cost services to protect the environment and public health. They work to promote the public health by encouraging cleaner energy, improved environmental performance by businesses, and more efficient transportation and land use, thereby achieving cleaner air and water, and improving the quality of life in the region. Learn more at www.greatriverslaw.org.

Great Rivers Environmental Law Center and Missouri Confluence Waterkeeper Send Notices of Intent to Sue Under the Clean Water Act to Two Missouri Sewage Plants for Visible Water Pollution

Water treatment facilities in rural Missouri and the state’s largest metro area both accused of violating bedrock federal environmental law.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contacts:
Bob Menees, Great Rivers Environmental Law Center, (314) 231-4181 bobmenees@greatriverslaw.org
Charles Miller, Missouri Confluence Waterkeeper, (314) 399 8454 charles@mowaterkeeper.org

St. Louis, Missouri // January 24, 2023 — Great Rivers Environmental Law Center and Missouri Confluence Waterkeeper have issued two notices of intent to sue under the Clean Water Act’s citizen suit provision. The Act allows citizens impacted by water pollution to sue those responsible to stop the pollution. These lawsuits will be filed in federal court sixty days after the notices are served on the City of Eminence and St. Louis Metropolitan Sewer District (MSD) if the violations are not corrected within this time by the sewer utilities or governmental agencies.

The first of these notices was sent to the City of Eminence for violations that are creating dangerous algal blooms in the Jacks Fork River, one of the crown jewels of Missouri’s Ozarks. The Jacks Fork River is spring fed and is designated as an Outstanding National Resource Water. Eminence’s wastewater treatment plant has been discharging nutrient-laden wastewater directly into the Jacks Fork since September of last year, causing unsightly algal blooms that harm not only the aesthetic qualities of the river, but decrease the amount of oxygen available in it, choking out aquatic life and violating Missouri’s water quality standards and the City’s wastewater permit. While Eminence’s discharges have turned this portion of the Jacks Fork into a soupy algal mess, other portions of the river have remained crystal clear, leaving little question as to the source of the pollution.

Two photos of the area downstream of Eminence’s wastewater treatment facility illustrating the effect of pollution on the Jacks Fork River.

“When you see a single area of a lake, river, or stream that is suffering from this kind of very noticeable, very unsightly pollution, it’s a red flag that someone is probably breaking the law. It’s especially concerning in a river that has been recognized and protected as a beautiful natural asset for such a long time. You just shouldn’t be seeing pollution like this in a river as precious as the Jacks Fork.”

Rachel Bartels, Missouri Confluence Waterkeeper’s executive director.

The second notice was sent to St. Louis’ Metropolitan Sewer District for violations at their Bissell Point facility on the Mississippi River. Since at least the summer of 2022, Bissell Point has been consistently discharging a malodorous, soapy substance from its pipes leading into the Mississippi. On many days, the soap scum flows downriver for nearly a quarter of a mile. The odor is so strong it can be frequently smelled at the top of the levees along the Mississippi, more than 50 feet above the river. The odor varies from soapy to what one Waterkeeper member described as “industrial, like degreaser or chemical cleaners.” Intermittent reports of these discharges stretch back even further, to August of 2021. Just like in Eminence, these discharges are violations of Missouri’s water quality standards and MSD’s permit.

“When you’re walking or biking along the Riverfront Trail, or paddling in the river, you can actually smell this pollution before you can see it. Many times, water pollution isn’t this obvious, but when it is, it’s definitely something we’re going to investigate.”

Charles Miller, policy manager at Missouri Confluence Waterkeeper

Two views of pollution from MSD’s Bissell Point facility, the first showing the extensive area of the Mississippi covered by the pollution, and the second showing a close-up view of soap scum.

These violations underscore that Missouri’s water pollution issues are not limited to a specific region, or to urban, suburban, or rural areas. St. Louis is the state’s largest metro area, and MSD is one of its largest public utilities, handling wastewater from hundreds of thousands of residential customers, and numerous industrial dischargers. Eminence is a scenic Ozarks town with fewer than 1,000 residents, and no major industrial polluters. Yet each is facing water pollution problems from poor water infrastructure maintenance or management.

Both issues were initially brought to Waterkeeper’s attention by members who were paddling on these stretches of river. Once notified, Waterkeeper investigated each case.

“In Eminence and St. Louis, paddlers were able to see the evidence of pollution – that isn’t always the case, which is why the monitoring that Waterkeeper does is so important. Situations like these really underscore the value of having independent watchdogs that are able to step in in cases where state agencies won’t.”

Linden Mueller, Development and Community Outreach Director at Great Rivers.

These violations underscore the valuable role that paddlers, anglers, and anyone who is
regularly on or near a waterbody can play in protecting it. If you notice any unusual sights or
smells in your local waterway, contact Missouri Confluence Waterkeeper at (314) 884-1473 or
via social media, where they are @MOWaterkeeper on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter.


Great Rivers Environmental Law Center is a non-profit 501(c)3 environmental law center providing free and low cost services to protect the environment and public health. They work to promote the public health by encouraging cleaner energy, improved environmental performance by businesses, and more efficient transportation and land use, thereby achieving cleaner air and water, and improving the quality of life in the region. Learn more at www.greatriverslaw.org.

Missouri Confluence Waterkeeper is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization focused solely on clean water and
dedicated to protecting the right to fishable, swimmable, drinkable water for all Missourians. Learn more at www.mowaterkeeper.org or @mowaterkeeper on social media.

Protection Won for Missouri Youth

It’s a shocking statistic: nearly 80% of Missouri children have detectable levels of lead in their blood. Elevated levels can cause irreversible harm to chidlren’s mental and physical development, and economically disadvantaged and minority children are most likely to suffer from elevated levels.

In 2020, when Madeline Semanisin (formerly Middlebrooks) joined Great Rivers as an Equal Justice Works fellow, most schools in Missouri were not required to test their water for lead, and even fewer were required to remediate high lead levels. 

Madeline dedicated her efforts to addressing the disparity in elevated blood lead levels and to protect all children from the risks of exposure. In 2020, she researched state policies and met with stakeholders from all backgrounds. 2021 found her forming the Missouri Filter First Community Coalition with groups across the state. In the 2022 legislative session, she devoted countless hours to leading the coalition, researching policy, creating educational packets, drafting legislation, meeting with legislators, and testifying in front of legislative committees.   

With the passage of the GET LEAD OUT OF DRINKING WATER ACT on July 1, 2022, Madeline’s work bore tremendous fruit. The bill requires any public school, private school, or provider of an early childhood education program that receives state funding to test for lead in their institution’s drinking water fixtures and to install filters to remediate those sources that are compromised.   

The bill’s passing is a monumental victory for children’s health across the state.  

Great Rivers is grateful to Madeline for her work, to Faber Daefur & Itrato for their sponsorship of her fellowship, and to the countless community partners who helped to make this progress possible. 

Rivers Environmental Law Center is a Missouri-based public interest law firm that provides free and reduced-fee services to individuals, organizations and citizen groups working to protect the environment and public health. We receive no government funding and rely on donations to sustain our work.

Earth Day Visitors Share Motivations to Protect the Environment

Thanks to the help of many wonderful volunteers, Great Rivers was represented at community events in St. Louis, Columbia, and Springfield Missouri on Earth Day 2022.
Volunteers shared inormation about Great Rivers’ work with interested visitors to our tables. We are grateful to all who helped. Pictured are our wonderful intern Nicole Switalski and young professional board member Rebekah Helmich.
Volunteers welcomed young visitors to our table to take our nature quiz. Youth who participated were awarded a “Great Rivers Ranger” button to take home. Pictured are super intern Sirapan To-in and board member Dhruv Mitroo.
Visitors of all ages shared why protecting the Earth matters to them. From centering human rights to leaving a better world for generations to come, the reasons people gave were unique – and powerful.
“It is a fundamental human rights issue.” – Madelyn Yoo
“We swim in the river” – Avery Ann Stuertz
“Her”- Colin Dowling and Daughter
“I want a future for my children.” – Michael Berg
“I value biodiversity and the wildlife that enriches my day!” – Ed Bayham
“I’m saving the earth for my grandchildren!! – Marsha Caradine
“It won’t be around forever – my kids would like to enjoy it.” – John and Evelyn Rehg
“I like to live!”
“We are all interconnected – environmental health equals human health! – Katie Iffrig
“It holds life” – Colton
“It keeps us alive” – Kolton
“My children and grandchildren need a place to live!!” – Patricia “Pat” Wolff
“When I get old, the water will be clean.” – Mike Wolff
We greatly enjoyed seeing new and long-time friends on Earth Day. Great Rivers is here for the people and only because of the people of our Region.


Great Rivers Environmental Law Center is a Missouri-based public interest law firm that provides free services to individuals, organizations and citizen groups working to protect the environment and public health. We receive no government funding and rely on donations to sustain our work.

Concerned Groups Move to Block Coal Mine Pollution From Being Dumped Into Big Muddy River

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 
Tuesday, May 10, 2022 
Press Contacts

SPRINGFIELD, IL. — Today, Sierra Club Illinois and Prairie Rivers Network announced they are appealing the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA)’s decision to grant a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit to Williamson Energy LLC, the owner of the Pond Creek coal mine.

The NPDES permit, which was granted by the IEPA on April 15, does not remedy major flaws in the 2019 draft permit, does not protect the environment, and does not adhere to Illinois or federal law. In the appeal, Sierra Club Illinois and Prairie Rivers Network, who are represented by Albert Ettinger and Great Rivers Environmental Law Center, ask the Illinois Pollution Control Board to order the IEPA to reconsider the permit in order to establish conditions necessary to protect the Big Muddy River and other Illinois waters. 

The IEPA granted this new NPDES permit to Williamson Energy LLC, which is a subsidiary of companies that emerged from the Murray Energy bankruptcy, despite the company’s long history of permit violations. In the newly granted permit, the IEPA declined to even consider placing a proper limit on chloride releases from the Pond Creek coal mine, despite the harmful impact excess chloride can have on wildlife in the river, and allows level of iron, sulfate and other pollutants that will harm the environment and potentially public health.  

“Despite making some improvements to the original draft permit, the NPDES permit issued by the IEPA still falls short of the critical protection we need for the Big Muddy River and its tributaries.The contaminants allowed in this permit are harmful to aquatic life, and overall the permit fails to adequately mitigate the impacts this dirty mine water will have on local waters, wildlife, and communities. The IEPA must at the very least strengthen the permit’s conditions.” 

-Amanda Pankau, Energy Campaign Coordinator with plaintiff Prairie Rivers Network

The permit decision also fails to consider the impact to the community at large, despite requirements in Illinois state law that these potential impacts be considered. Critically, the permit utterly fails to consider that the coal produced from the mine will contribute to disastrous climate change. Mining and burning coal pursuant to the NPDES permit will be destructive to the environment and increase emissions of climate-warming greenhouse gasses. The permit fails to consider the many side effects of mining practices as well, including land subsidence, coal dust, noise, and the loss of property values. Allowing coal plants like the Pond Creek coal mine to proceed with the status quo is contrary to Illinois’ clean energy and climate goals.

“Coal mining is a dirty, dangerous, and increasingly outdated practice. For a century, Illinois has sacrificed water quality, farmland, and communities to allow coal mining, but it’s time to turn to a better future. We’re acting today to protect these communities now and for future generations. Illinois is now leading the way to a clean energy future, and it’s time to hold polluting coal mines accountable for what they have done to our communities and say enough is enough.”

Jack Darin, Director of plaintiff Sierra Club Illinois

Local community members and environmental advocates explicitly brought these concerns to the IEPA’s attention as early as 2019, when local residents and advocates with Sierra Club Illinois and Prairie Rivers Network submitted hundreds of comments on the draft permit and raised concerns during a public hearing.

Advocates have also highlighted Williamson Energy LLC’s repeated inability to adhere to its relatively lax current permit. Since it began operation in 2005, the company is responsible for 78 water quality discharge violations at Pond Creek Mine alone.

Given the coal company’s ongoing violations, it’s clear that additional oversight and a strengthened permit are necessary in order to adequately protect Illinois waterways and the local community from further pollution and contamination.

You can read the Petition for Review here.


Press Contacts:
Sarah Rubenstein
Staff Attorney
Great Rivers Environmental Law Center
314.231.4181
srubenstein@greatriverslaw.org

Hannah Lee Flath
Communications Coordinator
Sierra Club
860.634.0225 
hannahlee.flath@sierraclub.org


Great Rivers Environmental Law Center is a Missouri-based public interest law firm that provides free services to individuals, organizations and citizen groups working to protect the environment and public health. We receive no government funding and rely on donations to sustain our work.

Meet Great Rivers’ 2022 Interns


Matthew Boyd – Outreach and Development Intern, Fall 2021 and Spring 2022

Matthew is a sophomore at Washington University in St Louis pursuing a double major in Environmental Policy and Sociology. Matthew’s passion for the environment and social justice lead him to Great Rivers where he hopes to help make a difference in his hometown and after Great Rivers he would like to do the same in more places. In his free time, Matthew primarily enjoys sports, writing and listening to music (check out the DJs at KWUR 90.3 FM!).


Rachel Deubner – Legal Intern, Summer 2022

Rachel graduated from Missouri University of Science and Technology in 2021 with a B.S. in Biological Sciences and Minors in Chemistry, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Political Science. In the fall she will be entering into her second year of law school at Saint Louis University. Before law school she spent her summers working at the Saint Louis Zoo which lead an appreciation of the environment and a desire to pursue a career in environmental law. In her free time she enjoys going for hikes and taking care of her many house plants. 


Tori Harwell – Goldman Fellow, Summer 2022

Tori is a junior at Washington University in St Louis pursuing a double major in Environmental Studies, and African and African American Studies. Tori is devoted to serving their community. She previously worked at Denver Public Health as a youth violence prevention advocate and Kilmer Lane and Newman Firm as an intern focusing on criminal justice reform. They cannot wait to continue this work from an environmental justice lens. In her free time, Tori likes to hike, garden, travel all around the world, and go to farmers’ markets where they are always searching for mismatching pottery bowls.


Molly Hopkins – Legal Intern, Summer 2022

Molly is a rising 3L at American University Washington College of Law.  She is originally from Milwaukee, WI and got her BA in French and Francophone Studies from Lawrence University.  Before law school, Molly worked various jobs ranging from a nanny, to a bank teller, to an equine veterinary assistant.  She hopes to continue in the public interest and environmental law fields after graduating from law school.  In her free time, Molly enjoys swimming, sewing, admiring her houseplants, hanging out with her bunnies and her horse, and spending time outdoors.


Emily Komie – Legal Intern, Summer 2022

Emily is a rising 2L at Lewis & Clark Law School in Portland, Oregon. Hailing from Chicago, she graduated from Colorado College where she studied Environmental Science and Filmmaking. Emily hopes to use her law degree to advance the principles of environmental justice, particularly in connection with public health issues. In her free time, she enjoys playing tennis, hiking, and thrifting. Emily is excited to support Great Rivers’ amazing work, and learn more about environmental law in the Midwest.


Cooper Mittelhauser – Legal Intern, Summer 2022

Cooper is a Missouri native and rising 2L at the University of Oregon, where he is an ENR Fellow with the Oceans, Coasts, and Watersheds Project and Moot Court Board Member. Before law school, Cooper spent a decade working in the outdoor industry. After several seasons of work as a guide in National Parks, he left the outdoor industry to pursue a legal education. Countless boat trips and fly-fishing excursions in Missouri’s Ozark Mountains inform Cooper’s desire to use his legal education to protect natural resources and promote access to clean water. In his free time, Cooper enjoys cycling and fly-fishing, but any other outdoor activity will do—bonus points if it involves a river.


Joe Oswald – Legal Intern, Spring 2022

Joe is a second-year student at Washington University School of Law. He grew up in Wausau, Wisconsin near a lake that was only swimmable thanks to the Clean Water Act. Before law school, Joe spent six years working in education, three in southern Austria and three in Minneapolis. He hopes to use his law degree to help preserve the Midwest’s incredible water resources. In his free-time, Joe enjoys hiking, bikepacking, birding (rather unsuccessfully), and watching the Milwaukee Bucks.


Alden Standley – Outreach and Development Intern, Spring 2022

Alden is a sophomore at Washington University in St. Louis where she is pursuing a B.A. in Global Health and Environment. Originally from San Francisco, California, Alden has always loved spending time outdoors – which, in recent years, has led her to be increasingly interested in environmental protection and policy. Outside of work, Alden loves playing volleyball, listening to music, traveling, and spending time with friends and family.


Sirapan To-in – Legal and Outreach and Development Intern, Fall 2021 and Spring 2022

Sirapan worked in the field of combating human trafficking and IUU in the seafood supply chain in Thailand prior to coming to the U.S. and worked at the University’s Interdisciplinary Environmental Law Clinic during his study at WashULaw. When he’s not working with Great Rivers, Sirapan also works as a farm justice intern at the Missouri Coalition for the Environment. Sirapan enjoys creating designs, infographics, and posters for educational purposes. In his free time, Sirapan can be found going on bike rides and camping trips.


Jimmy Yuen – Legal Intern, Spring 2022

Jimmy is a 2L student at WashULaw. He grew in Las Vegas, NV where the megadrought and other environmental issues in the desert city inspired his interest in sustainability. Jimmy graduated from UCLA with a B.A. in Global Studies and a deeper appreciation for the outdoors. In his free time, he enjoys hiking, traveling, and spending time with his cats.

Hyde Park Neighborhood Files Lawsuit Against Industrial Property Owners for Hazardous Conditions

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
4/7/2022
Press Contact

ST. LOUIS – The Hyde Park Neighborhood Association (HPNA) has filed a lawsuit involving 11 industrial properties affiliated with Shreve Automotive Plant, a long-time source of environmental concerns for the neighborhood. HPNA and the residents of Hyde Park are represented in these lawsuits by Stinson LLP, Great Rivers Environmental Law Center and Legal Services of Eastern Missouri.

The lawsuit alleges that the properties are being used in violation of the zoning code and concern buildings in disrepair, vehicles blocking sidewalk and street access and illegal dumping, and is in response to years of complaints made to the City by Hyde Park residents. Additionally, the lawsuit alleges that industrial waste, toxic chemicals and other forms of improper waste disposal at these properties are in violation of both St. Louis City ordinances and Missouri environmental laws.

Photos of the nuisance properties show buildings in grave disrepair, illegal dumping of automotive debris, vehicles and debris blocking sidewalk and street access, and improper disposal of potentially toxic industrial waste.

The lawsuits against Shreve Automotive, and its affiliantes, are just the latest action the Hyde Park neighborhood has taken against several long-standing nuisance properties in the community. “Hyde Park is on the cusp of a historic comeback, and these nuisance properties are doing us no favors in attracting new residents and businesses to this community,” said Donna Lindsay, a Hyde Park resident and named plaintiff in the lawsuit. “They contribute to unlawful behavior and reduce neighboring property values.”

In March 2019, Great Rivers Environmental Law Center contacted City officials, on behalf of the Hyde Park residents, regarding resident complaints on the nuisance properties; followed by efforts to reach out to the owners of such properties, regarding an amicable remediation of the hazardous conditions.

Neither led to improvements, resulting in the filing of the lawsuit in the 22nd Judicial Circuit Court in March 2022.

“With this lawsuit, Hyde Park wants it to be known, that this community will no longer tolerate this type of conduct. If businesses want to be supportive of this community and work for its betterment – we have your back 1,000%. If you want to treat this community like your personal rubbish bin, you have another thing coming.

– Fatimah Muhammad, Chair of the Hyde Park Neighborhood Association and named plaintiff in the lawsuit.


About Great Rivers Environmental Law Center: Since 2002, Great Rivers has served Missouri and Southern Illinois, providing free legal services to individuals, organizations, and citizen groups who are working to protect the environment and public health. We work through the courts and administrative agencies to safeguard the environment by enforcing environmental laws, especially air and water pollution laws and laws intended to protect wetlands, floodplains, open space, and endangered species. The issues which we address often have national significance, although the majority of our work is within Missouri and Illinois. Learn more at www.greatriverslaw.org.

About Stinson LLP: Stinson LLP collaborates with clients ranging from individuals and privately held enterprises to national companies and international public corporations. Our accomplished attorneys leverage deep knowledge and experience to deliver practical guidance, helping clients minimize risks and realize opportunities. We take pride in our collaborative approach, our lasting relationships and our unique perspectives. Connect with us at one of our 12 offices nationwide and at www.stinson.com.

About Legal Services of Eastern Missouri – Neighborhood Vacancy Initiative: Legal Services of Eastern Missouri has provided free civil legal help for low-income families for 65 years. In 2020, more than 30,000 people in 21 counties of eastern Missouri received services from four regional offices. The Neighborhood Vacancy Initiative launched in 2018 to provide free legal assistance to city neighborhoods to combat
vacancy, blight, and disinvestment. For more information, please visit www.lsem.org/neighborhood-vacancy-initiative.


Press Contact:
Sarah Rubenstein, Staff Attorney
Great Rivers Environmental Law Center
Office: 314.231.4181
srubenstein@greatriverslaw.org


Great Rivers Environmental Law Center is a Missouri-based public interest law firm that provides free services to individuals, organizations and citizen groups working to protect the environment and public health. We receive no government funding and rely on donations to sustain our work.

St. Louis on the Air Features President Bruce Morrison

St. Louis on the Air host Sarah Fenske sat down with Bruce Morrison, President of Great Rivers Environmental Law Center, and Steve Taylor, press secretary for the Global Justice Ecology Project, to discuss new federal funding designated to remediate Superfund sites in Missouri. The conversation focused on the factors the EPA considers for site selection, the impact of site remediation on Missouri residents, and the importance of environmental justice and citizen advocacy.

The recently passed Infrastructure Investment and Job Acts provides new funding for remediation of EPA Superfund sites, including two sites in Missouri slated for accelerated remediation. President Bruce Morrison, along with local environmental activist Steve Taylor, were featured on St. Louis on the Air to discuss the contamination at these sites and the importance of citizen advocacy and environmental justice in toxic waste remediation. 

This past December, the EPA announced that the recently passed Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act allocated one billion dollars to address the “backlog of Superfund sites” across the United States. Superfund sites are those in which hazardous waste has been “dumped, left out in the open, or otherwise improperly managed” (EPA). Following the creation of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) by Congress in 1980, classification as a “Superfund site” allows the EPA to clean up these sites with federal funds or money from the corporation responsible for the contamination (EPA).

That funding “is great to have,” said Taylor, who stated that, “if you live next to [one of the sites slated for cleanup], [the funding] could be life changing” but, “if you look at the magnitude and scope of the amount of contamination in Missouri, [this funding] really isn’t much.”

Currently, there are approximately 1,300 Superfund sites across the U.S., seventy-eight of which are in Missouri and Illinois. Out of these 1,300 projects, the EPA has selected forty-nine as “accelerated sites” that it will begin work on in the coming year. Two of these accelerated sites are in Missouri: Valley Park TCE and Vienna Wells. 

Morrison addressed the contamination occurring at the sites chosen for accelerated cleanup in Missouri, in which contaminated soil has begun seeping into the groundwater.

The contamination is so pervasive in Vienna, Missouri that, according to Morrison, “people can’t drink the water without the water getting cleaned up, and the water can’t be cleaned up because the soil is contaminated.

Morrison speculated that in addition to the urgency of the groundwater issues, the low-cost and time commitment of these projects were likely critical to their selection as accelerated sites. He believes that the EPA offers a fair timeframe and budget for the project’s completion, with the Valley Park TCE site cost projected at approximately $4.5 million and the Vienna Wells site budgeted for just under $20 million.

Later in the segment, Morrison and Taylor discussed the different types of remediation efforts: residential and industrial. Residential sites are those that are cleaned up to meet the standards of residential living spaces while industrial clean-ups only raise the site to the standard for people working but not living full-time on site. Industrial sites prohibit activities such as food production and day-care centers, but do not prohibit the building of power plants, warehouses, and salvage yards (EPA). It is not uncommon for individuals working on Industrial sites to be unaware of the area’s history and the risks of potential contamination.

Morrison detailed this process of partial clean up as “leaving selective processed materials in place, covering them with two feet of clean soil, and then securing the site with fencing”. What’s more, Morrison questioned,  

“if the waste would remain in place if the community was in a place of power to demand otherwise”, arguing that when property is considered commercially valuable or located in more affluent communities, the contamination clean-up is held to a higher standard. 

Morrison and Taylor placed an emphasis on the need for a greater commitment to minority communities, throughout the segment reminding listeners of the disproportionate impact of contamination sites on minority communities. Morrison pointed out the ways in which minority communities can be left out of the discussions and planning of these efforts. Taylor recalled his childhood growing up near a contaminated river and noted the lack of scientific studies that demonstrate the connection between disease and proximity to toxic waste that he, and many others, experienced.

Morrison and Taylor wrapped up the segment emphasizing that today, “following a period at the federal level where we deregulated”, it is extremely important to develop tougher regulations at every level and to ensure they are enforced. Arguing that enforcement takes citizen action and advocacy, Morrison and Taylor encouraged victims of toxic contamination to reach out to Great Rivers Environmental Law Firm. They concluded by emphasizing that individuals must not wait for issues of toxic contamination to be addressed by city governments or utility companies, instead, individuals must organize and advocate for themselves. 

You can read more and listen to the interview at: https://news.stlpublicradio.org/show/st-louis-on-the-air/2022-01-10/as-epa-plans-2-superfund-cleanups-in-missouri-st-louis-region-grapples-with-long-legacy-of-contamination.

You can reach out and contact Great Rivers via email: greatrivers@greatriverslaw.org, via phone: 1-314-231-4181, or by following this link: https://greatriverslaw.org/contact-us/.